Self-Concept in the Effectiveness of Gender Communication among University Students

Authors

  • Siti Zahro Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Musfichin Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53639/ijsse.v3i3.121

Keywords:

Self-concept, Gender Communication, University Students

Abstract

Gender communication effectiveness is a critical aspect of academic interaction in higher education, yet it is frequently influenced by internal psychological dynamics. This study aims to examine the influence of self-concept on the effectiveness of gender communication among university students. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a simple linear regression method, data were collected from 340 respondents selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. The research instruments included the Self-Concept Scale (Calhoun & Acocella) and the Gender Communication Scale (Michael Neer). The results of the analysis indicate that self-concept has a positive and significant effect on gender communication effectiveness (t = 11.620; p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.285 indicates that self-concept contributes 28.5% to the variance in gender communication. Descriptively, the majority of students fall into the moderate self-concept category (83.24%) and the sufficient gender communication category (89.71%). These findings confirm that psychological stability, in the form of positive self-assessment, serves as an essential foundation for the creation of adaptive and assertive cross-gender communication patterns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asmarani, Z., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Konsep diri individu pengguna media sosial terhadap komunikasi interpersonal remaja. Journal of Education Research, 4(3), 1548–1558. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.563

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Calhoun, J. F., & Acocella, J. R. (1990). Psychology of adjustment and human relationships (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. M. (2022). Gender differences in the perception of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac005

Hanif, M. (2024). The Role of Civic Education in Enhancing Community Welfare Through Social Participation. Technopreneurship and Educational Development Review, 1(3), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.54373/tender.v1i3.229

Harris, M. A., & Orth, U. (2020). The link between self-esteem and social relationships: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1459–1477.

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: For education and the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

Juliano, S. P. (2015). Komunikasi dan gender: Perbandingan gaya komunikasi dalam budaya maskulin dan feminin. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, 5(1).

Maela, S. N., & Hanif, M. (2025). Digitalisasi Manajemen Keuangan Pesantren melalui Implementasi Aplikasi CARDS. Media Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 270-281. https://doi.org/10.30738/mmp.v8i2.20447

Mercer, S. (2020). The Self in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Merchant, K. (2022). How Men and Women Differ: Gender Differences in Communication Styles, Influence Tactics, and Leadership Styles. Claremont Colleges Senior Research.

Neer, M. R., & Hudson, D. D. (1983). The gender communication scale: A scale development of an instrument to measure gender role behavior [Presentasi Makalah]. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED238072

Qibtiyah, A. (2017). Sensitivitas gender dan pola komunikasi mahasiswa/i UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Musawa: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam, 16(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2017.162.173-184

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow.

Wheelan, S. A., & Verdi, A. F. (1992). Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact? Sex Roles, 27(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289651

Wood, J. T., & Fixmer-Oraiz, N. (2019). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Yulikhah, S., Bukhori, B., & Murtadho, A. (2019). Self concept, self efficacy, and interpersonal communication effectiveness of student. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 4(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v4i1.3196

Yusup, R., & Hanif, M. (2025). Parental Involvement Management In Enhancing The Quality Of Qur’anic Tahfidz Learning. JIEMAN: Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 7(2), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.35719/jieman.v7i2.291

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Zahro, S., & Musfichin. (2025). Self-Concept in the Effectiveness of Gender Communication among University Students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Science and Education (IJSSE), 3(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijsse.v3i3.121

Issue

Section

Articles